If adverse impact is identified within a test, what action should be taken?

When adverse impact is identified within a test, the most appropriate action is to justify or reexamine the standards. This involves a careful evaluation of the test to determine if the standards used are valid and equitable for all individuals involved, ensuring that they measure the intended constructs effectively without unfairly disadvantaging any particular group based on inherent characteristics such as race, gender, or age.

Justifying or reexamining the standards helps to ensure that any performance measures used in tactical settings are appropriate for all candidates and reflect their actual capabilities rather than biased assumptions or unrealistic expectations. This process may involve statistical analysis, feedback from stakeholders, and an exploration of whether the standards are truly relevant to the tasks at hand. This approach is crucial in maintaining fairness and integrity within the testing process, ultimately aiming for a selection protocol that supports diversity and equal opportunity in tactical environments.

While other options may suggest alternative routes, such as destroying test results or modifying tests, they do not adequately address the root cause of adverse impacts or the importance of validation in the testing process for fairness and effectiveness.